Glossary entry (derived from question below)
French term or phrase:
absence manifeste de nouveauté
English translation:
obvious lack of novelty
French term
absence manifeste de nouveauté
Ie brevet est delivré. L'lnstitut National de la Propriete Industrielle n'est pas habilite, sauf
dans Ie cas d'absence manifeste de nouveaute, aen refuser la delivrance, La validite d'un
brevet releve exclusivement de l'appreciation des tribunaux.
4 +2 | obvious lack of novelty | cc in nyc |
Dec 22, 2010 16:21: Stéphanie Soudais changed "Term asked" from "absence manifeste de nouveaute" to "absence manifeste de nouveauté" , "Field" from "Other" to "Law/Patents"
Non-PRO (1): cc in nyc
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
obvious lack of novelty
agree |
rkillings
: 'manifest' adj. also works. The synonymous adjective you wouldn't want to use is 'patent'. :-)
15 hrs
|
Thank you for your comment.
|
|
agree |
philippe vandevivere
: yep cc
21 hrs
|
Thank you for your comment.
|
Discussion
http://www.epo.org/index_fr.html